What are the best and worst things about public transit in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia? How could it be improved?

By: | Post date: October 20, 2016 | Comments: No Comments
Posted in categories: Australia

This is a subject of acute interest to many a Melburnian.

Best:

  • Overall, reliable. Yes, when it falls over, it falls over horridly; but considering how much of the infrastructure is 150 years old, it is bearing the load remarkably well.
  • Reasonable coverage, given it’s 150 years old. So long as urban development followed the train tracks, which was the case until a decade ago.

Worst:

  • Overcrowding; if you’re in Zone 1, don’t even bother boarding a train between 7:30 and 9.
  • Chronic underinvestment. I for one welcome our new Chinese overlords; at least they understand infrastructure. (And they don’t have federalism as a mechanism for everyone to dodge the responsibility of infrastructure.)
  • If you’re in exurbia, particularly in the Western Suburbs, you’re shit out of luck: the train network is radial, not tangential. In fact, real estate agents in the Western Suburbs are reportedly told not to even bother showing clients a house, if it’s not 10 mins away from a train station.

The lack of a train connection to the airport is unfortunate, but not the worst thing possible.

Improvements?

  • More money. And none of this bullshit federal/state nonsense. Take Tony Abbott out with a projectile tram if he ever comes into power again.
  • More longterm thinking. I hope the new central tunnels are part of that.
  • More tangential connections. Good that money is being poured into more central connections, I guess, but exurbia is tumbleweeds, and radial connections only get you so much 50 km out.

Leave a Reply